SES Chicago: The Importance of Executing a Campaign (5:32)

Posted on by Abby Johnson | 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Out of all the people we talk to about any campaign whether it is marketing, SEO, PPC, or whatever else, they all tell us to set goals and keep those goals in mind throughout the entire campaign. While that is very true, Todd Friesen in the above video explains how more times than not, that goal seems to override the execution of your campaign.

Ultimately, everyone’s goal is to make more money. Depending on what you do, that goal could be met by selling more products, obtaining more subscribers to your newsletter, gaining more advertisers, or any number of reasons. The irony of the issue is that in many cases, you could actually exceed your goal if your plan is properly executed.

Todd points out that 99 percent of the time, internal implementation is the problem since marketers do not calculate the time it takes for the IT department to carry out the campaign. If you are using an agency, a pay-per-click campaign is easier to execute because the client is only responsible for their landing page.

Once your campaign is in proper motion, another issue you cannot leave out is the measurement. Todd says, “The only real measure of success is dollars in the bank.”

You are not showing yourself any favors if you go to the trouble of executing a plan and then fail to measure your progress. How will you know if you’re successful and if you’ve met your goals? How will you know what to change next time to make it work better? The bottom line is that you will not know these answers unless you measure.

Posted in: Advertising and Marketing, SEO, SES Chicago 2008, Todd Friesen
Tagged: , , , , , , , .
Get the Flash Player to see this player.

3 Responses to SES Chicago: The Importance of Executing a Campaign

  1. Scott says:

    I am not sure if I understand Todd’s figures. I get the philosophy, but the numbers don’t add up. According to his examples, If a company spends $100,000 on advertising to generate $500,000 in sales, and is left with $1,000 net, a gross margin of 20.2% is implied.((500K*20.2%)-100K=1K))
    When taht same company decides to spend $1M it generates $2M in Sales (2:1)Using that same margin of 202% on the $2M in sales leaves only $404K for the company that chose to spend $1M on advertising, leaving them $596K in the hole.
    Is there something here that I don’t understand?

    Scott Kahle
    http://www.contractors-solutions.net

  2. When taht same company decides to spend $1M it generates $2M in Sales (2:1)

  3. Rahul Singh says:

    very tough for me to do PPC help me out to learn a PPC

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>