iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Feedback
WebProNews Home About Feedback RSS
Get the Flash Player to see this player.


WebProNews Videos Twitter Page

TwitterHawk: Spam or Not?

Posted on: April 6th, 2009 | 4 Comments

Twitter is receiving almost as much attention as Google receives at industry events. In this interview from SES New York, Jeff Ferguson of Napster talks about TwitterHawk and the marketing power of it.

TwitterHawk is a new tool for Twitter that is still in the developing stages. It is keyword-based and allows users to create a variety of reply phrases to respond to people with. TwitterHawk usage costs 5 cents per tweet (reply) but can be purchased in advance through a variety of packages.

In an effort to build up a client’s Twitter base, Jeff decided to use the tool for a DJ for iGlobal Radio. He used keywords such as Radiohead, alternative music, Indie-Music, etc. When someone tweeted one of those keywords, they were sent an automated response that said something similar to “If you like Radiohead, you’ll love iGlobal Radio…”

As a result, TwitterHawk helped Jeff’s client to receive many more Twitter followers and created more interactivity with his followers. On the negative side, there were a couple of people that accused Jeff’s client of spam. Jeff responded to one user and found that he didn’t like that fact that a robot was responding to him and that it was a paid service.

Jeff countered the argument by explaining that his client wrote his own copy for his responses. Also, his client’s actions were completely human but simply carried out in an automated fashion.

If users only use TwitterHawk and are not personally active on the service, then Jeff says those users could be classified as spammers. His client however, is active on Twitter and used TwitterHawk to better target his market.

What are your thoughts on TwitterHawk? Do you think it is pure marketing or does it cross the line and create a spam issue?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 3.33 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

4 Comments on “TwitterHawk: Spam or Not?”

  1. Twitter is really a great invention, but I think blogging is even more important to create some traffic. But I can use some of the tips.

  2. Any posting without actual participation is SPAM.

  3. if you’re wondering why i care about this on an easter sunday, im making sure everythings ticking over with the biz!

    anyway…

    twitterhawk is clearly spam.

    if this is used in twitter – a global message should be sent to everyone asking them to opt-in to receiving twitterhawk messages or it will be SPAM.

    terrible. we all HATE SPAM.

  4. Sammy says:

    As Jeff said, I don’t see what the big difference is between hiring a bunch of people to tweet or hiring a bot? I’m all for TwitterHawk – have been using it since inception and couldn’t be happier.

Leave a Reply